Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[FOFreddie]

Thanks for the reply Kthomp

Lets hope SCOTUS completely invalidates the SPS. If they dont - it goes against fundamental fairness that the UST could plant an internal memo that discusses nationalization and wiping out private shareholders in March of 2008 and then use the powers bestowed by a Conservatorship which may have been unnecessary if the UST officials acted ethically.

https://arc.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/pdf/Treasury-Ethics-Handbook.pdf

It seems clear that any sharing of internal UST analysis should not be disseminated outside of the UST and if there is a potential rational reason to do so they should have sought approval from internal ethics and legal departments. We do not know if this internal approval was obtained but if it wasnt then the UST emails disclosed in the FCIC documents show likely malfeasance and breach of ethics.

Under Delaware Law - Can controlling shareholders be enjoined from exercising contractual rights obtained by past unethical or illegal acts?

Doesn't the internal UST memo discussing Nationalization that was planted most likely unethically in the marketplace show the intent for a unconstitutional taking and the price of the stock at the time of the public offering the basis for determining the value of the property unconstitutionally confiscated by the taking?