Are you suggesting leaving the gold standard was a violation of your constitution. If not, what exactly are you talking about?
Be very specific as i don't understand how your
"Perhaps you should read the constitution... You may not like it, but it is the law. http://www.rogershermansociety.org/caveat.htm “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) P - “When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491."
et al applies to my post.
PS: Are you by any chance one of those sovereign citizens who have wasted so much of your American courts' time?? And of ours in years past.
Seriously. I just don't understand how your reply pertains to my post.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”