Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[imtheshadow]

problem is courts have been doing weird shxt all along ... they could say, oh, the loan was paid back in full BUT the warrants were the kicker for taking the risk ... and the consideration of $0.0000000000000 (you get the idea) was appropriate for insolvent companies ... of course that bs ... but so was the "shall" vs "may" argument ... the board "approval" ... the total write-down of the DTA ... the anti-injunction "no-one-can-sue-us-even-though-we-broke-the-law" ... etc., etc., etc. ... until direct claim are allowed, the utter bs underlying the cship itself, and warrants, will remain LEGALLY walled-off ... even though the theft occurred in broad daylight ... I'm hoping scotus throws us a bone and I can get out at $10 ... but am prepared to be very disappointed by some fancy bs legalese rationale as to why the nws is valid, no direct claims are allowed and our wonderful director that so many think is here to help us can keep his job ... I may not be skeptic7 ... but I'm at least skeptic2.5 ... lol