News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2
Posts 639
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/31/2001

Re: Sentinel post# 49039

Thursday, 10/23/2003 10:21:57 AM

Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:21:57 AM

Post# of 93862
Question for you…..

Did you believe "Those who are actually there" and " intimately involved" the first four times they announced a shipping timeframe for the F-T unit?? When the "party intimately involved with the design roadmap" announced the MP2000 "is shipping", did you believe them then?

When they made all the other announcements that Cassie has pointed out, did you believe them then because they were "intimately involved" and "actually there"? When everyone one of those bogus announcements failed to deliver anything, did you ever wonder how anyone "intimately involved" and "actually there" could have been so wrong, so many times??

Since it has happened so many times before (just about EVERY time!), and you claim it is totally out of EDIG's hands, why do you suppose they still keep making timeline announcements when their supposed OEM's do not? Are they just slow to learn or can you think of another reason they keep doing it over and over and over?

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today