InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251724
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119574
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: dewophile post# 228356

Sunday, 02/28/2021 3:30:54 PM

Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:30:54 PM

Post# of 251724
MTCR—MET409 @50mg—>mean_LDL_increase=8.3%_(placebo_ adjusted)_&mean_HDL_decrease=22.9%_(placebo_adjusted) in the phase-1b NASH trial:

https://www.journal-of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(21)00099-4/fulltext

MET409 was associated with on-target high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreases (mean changes of -23.4% for 80 mg and -20.3% for 50 mg vs 2.6% in PBO) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) increases (mean changes of 23.7% for 80 mg and 6.8% for 50 mg vs -1.5% in PBO).

8.3% is not a big number, but one can question whether a suitable drug for NASH should cause any increase in LDL while also lowering HDL.

The MET-409 pruritis data were not exactly great, although they compare favorably to some FXR agonists:

Pruritus (mild-moderate) occurred in 16% (50 mg) and 40% (80 mg) of MET409-treated subjects.

MTCR has decided to move forward with only the 50mg dose of MET-409.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.