Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[QuantumTravesty]

Thanks Ted but I’m not exactly sure what’s your ruling on this lol. From the 14c you provided they took the same action that I’m guessing they could do again now without asking retail holders for their vote.
From 14c
WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY, AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY.

In your opening you said they need a proxy but provided the 51% written consent clause that gets around putting things to a full vote of all shareholders. Unless the written 51% is the proxy IDK and am not that smart.
I just started this to do the math and open the conversation up to the fact they could do again what you’ve dug up from 2010 regarding decisions that could be made that current shareholders think they will have a voice in without them. I said I’d seen it before and you’ve reminded me where one of the instances was.