I have your concerns, as well, Shotsky, and let me add more.
Think about it. To validate its standing as a viable and legitimate company, NSAV post on the iboard two sources as evidence of due diligence. Yet the first source is a DD slide show that was produced by an unnamed individual who clarifies that he is not a financial advisor. The second source is provided by a YouTube want-to-be stock commentator who has a following of only 1,200.
Now why on earth would a major corporation herald and let stand, as company validations, a YouTuber with a small following, and a slide show that was produced by . . . well, no one knows.
Is this the best DD NSAV has to offer on the board?