really? she's getting paid for losing and dragging out the process?
This is in the opinion concerning her payment...
"Lastly, Griffin requests a reasonable fee for her efforts to improve the settlement. She cites two independent grounds for the requested fee award. Neither accompanied her one-line request to the Bankruptcy Court for “costs and fees associated with bringing the Objection.”26 Griffin’s new grounds are really new arguments presented for the first time on appeal. We decline to consider them."
So who is giving her money though the backdoor against of the 3rd circuit court ruling?
Oh and "NOT PRECEDENTIAL" btw. She thought she might set a Precedence.