>Would they price it purely on revenue maximization vs the clear indications, or cheaper to try to expand its scope of application?<
The latter, according to GTC’s own guidance.
The big underserved market is prophylactic use by hemophiliacs, where obtaining reimbursement would necessitate a substantially lower price than what NovoSeven sells for.
>Care to conjecture what they might ask for it?<
I'll get back to you on that one
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”