Risk vs high reward potential. No one should be sold 100% on this we are making an assumption here. One obviouly glaring mistake in the filings so far is in the 8-K in one section he states PS correct par of .001 which matches the CoD but in another section claims they have a par of .0001 which is a glaring typo. The 15-10G states Commons with a par of .0001 which matches no CoA. Is this a typo too? Hoping not. I like my theory better as it makes more sense given the situation. $XMET
ALL STATEMENTS REPRESENT PERSONAL OPINIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ADVICE