![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, January 05, 2007 10:10:54 PM
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=DxoEtEmuaADMWNYYM6GnHQ%253d%253d
One action/ammendment and that was the original articles of incorporation establishing the SPAC!
Why else would the OSC bring complaints against both entities. The Canadian Sulja was a private Canadian Company. No trading of any kind. Should only be involved post merger but that would be Sulja Nevada and the Canadian company should have been part of that entity! No reason to name them both unless they never merged! JMHO!
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM