this is question number 2 treasury asked the SCOTUS
2. Whether the statute’s anti-injunction clause—which prohibits courts from taking any action that would “restrain or affect the exercise of powers or functions of the Agency as a conservator,” 12 U.S.C. 4617(f )— precludes judicial invalidation of the Third Amendment.
it has 2 sides: 1) is 4617F legal 2) and if it is legal, is the 3th amendment thus also legal (spoiler alert it's not, as their statute forbids to give away stuff)