Imperial Brands cigar sale to be completed by end of this month Email This Post Email This PostThe man behind the purchase? Macau casino mogul Alvin Chao. The man behind the purchase? Macau casino mogul Alvin Chao.
CUBA STANDARD — Imperial Brands plc says it expects to complete the sale of its Cuban cigar assets to Chinese buyers by Oct. 29.
The Chinese buyers have not announced the purchase yet.
According to a Bloomberg report, corporate filings of Instant Alliance in Hong Kong list an individual as officer who also works as chief financial officer for Suncity Group, the gambling and hospitality conglomerate controlled by Macao billionaire Alvin Chau. An official of Suncity, which has little experience and background in the premium cigar business, denied any direct involvement in the purchase.
Helms-Burton exposure
In August 2020, the heirs of Cuban cigar entrepreneur Ramón Rodríguez Gutiérrez, who owned and operated the Partagás factory building in Havana, filed suit in federal court in Miami, accusing Imperial of profiting from confiscated property. The plaintiffs are asking the district court for unspecified damages.
A plaintiff’s lawyer argues that the Chinese buyers will be liable under Title III of he Helms-Burton law, which punishes “trafficking” of property confiscated by the Cuban state after the revolution.
“Imperial Brands and Instant Alliance have entered into a commercial arrangement for the sale of Habanos that uses or otherwise benefits from confiscated property,” said Evan Stroman, a Miami attorney who represents the heirs to the extinct Banco Nuñez in their Title III case against French bank Société Générale. “Both Imperial Brands and Instant Alliance are in violation of Title III and Title IV.”
Under Title IV, the U.S. Secretary of State can deny entry visas to officials from both companies.
According to one Miami legal adviser of Helms-Burton plaintiffs, Imperial will still be subject to the lawsuit, despite the sale.
“The statute of limitations goes back two years prior to the cessation of trafficking,” said Nick Gutiérrez. “They can still sue Imperial either way.”