News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257267
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biophud post# 40077

Monday, 01/01/2007 1:52:40 PM

Monday, January 01, 2007 1:52:40 PM

Post# of 257267
> REGN – The CNTF [Axokine] failure made me question REGN. They found a high percentage of neutralizing antibodies to CNTF in a phase III trial… I just don't see how they could have missed this in the Phase I and II trials… Neutralizing antibodies could be an issue with their VEGF trap, a non-native fusion protein.<

A few points:

1. Axokine was developed with the intention of eliminating the neutralizing antibodies found in REGN’s first-generation CNTF compound. Thus, the presence or lack of neutralizing antibodies was very much in focus throughout the Axokine program. Why REGN didn’t see them until phase-3 is mystifying, but it’s not because they didn’t look for them.

2. Axokine was not a “trap” molecule, and hence I’m unclear as to why you think VEGF-Trap could be burdened by neutralizing antibodies.

3. In AMD, REGN is planning to test very high doses of VEGF-Trap relative to the approved dose of Lucentis. This can be interpreted in two ways: 1) REGN is confident that neutralizing antibodies are a non-issue and hence they don’t need to hold back on dosing; or 2) REGN is concerned about neutralizing antibodies and they are dosing unnecessarily high (in terms of efficacy) in order to prove to the FDA that antibodies are not a problem. We may not know which of these cases is the dominant one until we see more clinical data.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today