Sunday, December 31, 2006 7:01:00 PM
Airys, with all due respect, the company and Steve Sulja cannot speak for what detrimental actions may have been taken by Petar Vucicevich and Andrew DeVries, because frankly, I don't think they have a clue yet to what extent their underhanded actions have jeopardized the Sulla family name and business. At this point, I still want to think that Steve Sulja was somehow "used" by the bad actors, at least to some extent, because he was "taken in" by Petar and Andrew, and naive as to what they were doing, at least up until some point when it may have hit him between the eyes. Time shall tell.
I am quite sure that they will have separate law firms representing them (that is, if Andrew even bothers to respond or show up, which I doubt, as he surely is not still in Ontario). It also sounds to me as though Petar might not have a very good attorney, if one at all, due to the fact that he continues to very indiscriminately spew information out in a somewhat public manner. If I were his attorney, I would refuse to continue his representation. Any attorney worth his salt would have shut Petar up right away. I have seen many uncontrollable clients in my law office experience, and the attorneys simply do not abide this sort of behavior.
Given that, the January 8 hearing will indeed be interesting, though not very substantive, as it appears they will only decide whether to extend the Dec. 22 CTO order, and set a hearing on the OSC complaint (the heart of the matter).
I hope you enjoy the New Year celebration with loved ones (or at least people you like...LOL), without bothering to look at this board.
Jannie
I am quite sure that they will have separate law firms representing them (that is, if Andrew even bothers to respond or show up, which I doubt, as he surely is not still in Ontario). It also sounds to me as though Petar might not have a very good attorney, if one at all, due to the fact that he continues to very indiscriminately spew information out in a somewhat public manner. If I were his attorney, I would refuse to continue his representation. Any attorney worth his salt would have shut Petar up right away. I have seen many uncontrollable clients in my law office experience, and the attorneys simply do not abide this sort of behavior.
Given that, the January 8 hearing will indeed be interesting, though not very substantive, as it appears they will only decide whether to extend the Dec. 22 CTO order, and set a hearing on the OSC complaint (the heart of the matter).
I hope you enjoy the New Year celebration with loved ones (or at least people you like...LOL), without bothering to look at this board.
Jannie

