Sure...Engage, license. Except there has been no license!
Zero license. Zero revenue from actual use of process or patents resulting in a real world product. And the years pass by, only subsisting off government aid and the continued selling(printing) of more shares. Dilution by printing shares comes at the expense of existing shareholders.
Something truly disruptive is sold, call it license, product or company. Endless research and development without sales is not a business plan, but more likely a job-for-life paycheck for management/insiders. A content management kills any bottom line. As does continued research of the next big thing to come along... And the next, without market acceptance or reward.
Technology does not age well. Competitors are moving ahead, not sitting on their hands fishing for dreams. Whatever NanoOne has is meaningless without sales/revenue. The major players buy/license what they need, be first to market and use it before something better comes along.
Happy talk PR's and requesting trading halts, especially when the real market does not care, given their no earnings from sales, only offered a quick pump to screw amateur investors. It remains simply a Canadian story stock. If and when an actual sales/license deal is on the table, common shareholders will likely be the last to know... And as for your 'actually' crap, stuff it.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
