~ RD, It Has "ALWAYS" Been My Opinion That There Was A Purposeful Effort To Discourage The "Ownership" Of the WMI Common Shares and the Number of The Common Share "Participants" Diminished" ~
... There was an obvious push after the Mediated Result in 2011', and all through the first quarter of 2012' ... to "Make It Appear" that ones transitional ownership by way of the DTC ESC Cusips, ... or the transitional shares issued into the new WMI IPO', that the WMI Preferreds or the PIERS were to be considered the best choice of Anything' Other Than ones ownership of an original WMI Common Share' ...
even ("dont_b_kruel") was publically promoting the PIERS by way of sleepy's advice, while privately telling friends and family to hold or open positions in the WMI Common Shares ... wamuq' ...
... So, I' have always believed that the false and fake presentations making the preferred or the piers appear to be the better purchase choice, were all done in a shameful attempt to mislead the people', diminish the participants, and have a greater recovery amount to be divided by a smaller number ...
as I posted the original numbers, ... only roughly 2/3rds of the commons released ...
AZ