News Focus
News Focus
Followers 16
Posts 1637
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2020

Re: Maximilliano post# 27534

Saturday, 10/03/2020 8:47:30 AM

Saturday, October 03, 2020 8:47:30 AM

Post# of 64130
Regarding the comment of "Bear in mind the FCELB at $350 pays interest rate equivalent of 15%" I am not sure what point you making. If you mean that the dividend yield is 15% for those who buy the preferred stock on the open market at a price of $350/share, then I believe that is correct (I haven't looked up the dividend rate lately, but I will claim at the moment during this post). But if you are saying (or implying) that FCEL has a cash outflow (or expenses) of 15% on those shares of preferred stock that is incorrect. It is incorrect because the FCELB stock was issued at a $1000 selling price (which is also its par value) in its initial offering and thus its coupon dividend rate was only 5.25% (if indeed the current dividend yield is 15% for shares purchased on the secondary market at $350/share). FuelCell Energy received $1000 for each of the shares which were sold to investors (not merely $350) and thus there cash flow (or expense) rate is only 5.25% yearly on those shares, not 15%.

Regarding your comments that FCEL are "... are having delays on projects in backlog despite having millions of dollars ..." and "have been talking about reaching profitability for years. Something always seems to get in the way" I agree completely with those comments and those things give me concern. If I didn't have those concerns I would likely had purchased back more shares of FCEL stock yesterday than I did.

I also agree with your statement of "Lately we have generation with big losses, stacks failing at Tulare, ... and after a $70M ATM they drop a offering on the common shareholders after market close when they knew investors would jump on the CT 11.2MW awards news when they were silent for months", except though the generation losses exceed $1 million, they are not big on a percentage basis of generation revenues (in my opinion), and I am not sure if the stacks at Tulare were failing or instead had less severe problems [I do know that FCEL said there were site issues and that they replaced a stack there (or replaced more than one stack there)]. Regarding your claim of "... SOFC in Pittsburg a disaster ..." I have no knowledge about the SOFC in Pittsburg and thus I probably should research that topic.

In posting to this site, it is my primary aim to provide accurate information and good ideas to the readers, for their benefit - and not hype or nonsense or gross exaggerations (except maybe for humor). I hope I achieve that goal.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent FCEL News