What I plan to do in Windsor this trip is work to gain verifiable proof of all PRIOR PRs. I don't want to see anything relating to the future, as this would be considered insider information. I would like to see correspondence, contracts, etc. If they cannot provide this information, I believe it would be in their best interest to retract the PRs where this is the case.
All material non-public information comes under the insider trading laws. Whether if affects prior lies or future lies is absolutely irrelevant. In fact, if anyone has bothered to notice, most companies only PR things that actually have happened in the real world.
If you're hoping to gain verifiable proof of something that's important (material) it obviously comes under the auspices of the insider trading laws. It is obvious even if hundreds of people here feel very comfortable ignoring it.