Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[boogaloo]

More important, IMO, is WHY lawyers are muting SLJB. Right? You've overlooking the basic premise for their inability to "defend themselves". Lawyers wouldn't mute them if they had legit business to PR and if everything was "ok". Also, why do you continue to converse and "believe" what you're told by a person who was mentioned in a recent PR as a NON-management member?

Also, IYO the deals and contracts are real. Right, in your opinion... because PV told you so, right? How truthful and honest do you feel he's been with others before you? Airys, step out of the box for a minute. IMO, The SEC isn't going to halt it because of emails, and they're even less likely to "un-halt" due to emails. Don't you think that every stock which is halted is packed full of shareholders who feel it shouldn't be?? The answer to that is YES.

Good luck, though, if you think this situation boils down to who sends more emails. I wonder if the SEC might perk up (something you don't want) if shareholders flood them with "don't halt our stock" emails? You think they'd be surprised that shareholders don't want the stock halted??