To clarify, I didn't expect news today and had not checked. My friend texted me and wrote "partnership news". Excitedly, I googled hoping to see somebody like AstraZeneca had bought in. So when I read it, yes, the word small came to mind. You say I'm negative when all I ask are legit questions. Someone had to actually ask in the cc what happened to the $3 million backlog. They weren't going to say it (at least is seemed that way) and that bothers me. Then they explain it by saying that they lost the orders because the virus was cooling off (paraphrasing). I actually think we lost them because we weren't able to deliver at the time of the order, the virus cooled a bit, and the ordering folks said nevermind. Had they been shipped there's no time to cancel. And as for Dr. Chan, he got interviews on national shows, big shows, when the virus was THE topic, white hot, and was the sole reason he was being interviewed. He downplayed the importance to the company. He BLEW those interviews by not realizing the magnitude of the moment. Had he been a dynamic leader/spokesperson in those interviews, I am convinced the course for us would have been dramatically different. That doesn't make me negative. It makes me a thinker who tries to piece together where we are and, more importantly, why. It makes me ask "Why aren't we in the mid teens in the very least like Hemopure predicted?" (and I agreed with). Some things have been fumbled. Some will disagree but you won't change my mind.
Market Data 
Markets 
