InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 240
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/16/2017

Re: Ranchu post# 389

Friday, 08/14/2020 10:34:36 AM

Friday, August 14, 2020 10:34:36 AM

Post# of 661
Hi Ranchu. The first issue is that this is not a criminal case its a civil action. If Brenner were to have shown up he would have been subjected to questioning from Frank's lawyer. The questioning might have revealed criminal conduct on Brenner's part which Frank could have further pursued. Brenner and his lawyer knew what they were doing and the decision was made to be a no show. Naked shorting is hard to stop unless you enlist a firm that specializes in stock fraud. They are very good and very expensive. In my opinion if Brenner wasn't culpable in other ares of Hellix fraud he could have shown up and simply plead no contest. However to avoid incriminating himself he became a no show. Depending on the scope of Franks complaint he may just get all he asked for in his complaint. The case designation has the words "title to property" in it. Im just guessing but maybe clear title to the property is the major objective Frank seeks to obtain. Brenner may have been standing in the way and why the drilling permit never materialized. Hopefully Franks prevails in the most important issues and can move forward soon. -Lamont