| Followers | 2 |
| Posts | 217 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 03/09/2020 |
Monday, August 10, 2020 4:48:06 AM
TT, I don't mind. Can we agree on the assumptions to be taken though ...
Let's take a reference, the figure you just posted:
--------
-> Q1. Where do we consider the turns as hitting the level/vs anywhere? The definition of "close enough"
- in the picture there are some turns around pivot (or "close" enough)
- but at least that many above and below pivots/ and between pivot and next level (above the tolerance level of "close enough").
Visually I would say there are at least twice as many turns outside of the pivot level above and below the close-enough, and not in the close-enough vecinity of the next level up/down...
-> Q2. What is a turn? The size of it, and its duration in time ...
- counting turns depend on what we consider a "turn".
0.25, 0.5, 1 point swing? or any single wiggle visible? The bigger the "turn" size for qualification - the more noise eliminated.
When the jump between levels is 3 points - what should be a turn/price rejection.
We need the size of the turn on the vertical, and the time (how many bars below/above that level. E.g. on a 1min chart - is a price swing inside a single bar considered a positive? )
-> Q3. Which time frame shall we consider?
- I don't know the time frame you consider here - but a 1 min chart will look different than a 15/30, or 240 min chart where you only have an aggregated candle crossing the said levels and no turn "visible".
- so which granularity shall we consider, for counting the positive/negatives?
Any comments on the above?
Let's take a reference, the figure you just posted:
--------
-> Q1. Where do we consider the turns as hitting the level/vs anywhere? The definition of "close enough"
- in the picture there are some turns around pivot (or "close" enough)
- but at least that many above and below pivots/ and between pivot and next level (above the tolerance level of "close enough").
Visually I would say there are at least twice as many turns outside of the pivot level above and below the close-enough, and not in the close-enough vecinity of the next level up/down...
-> Q2. What is a turn? The size of it, and its duration in time ...
- counting turns depend on what we consider a "turn".
0.25, 0.5, 1 point swing? or any single wiggle visible? The bigger the "turn" size for qualification - the more noise eliminated.
When the jump between levels is 3 points - what should be a turn/price rejection.
We need the size of the turn on the vertical, and the time (how many bars below/above that level. E.g. on a 1min chart - is a price swing inside a single bar considered a positive? )
-> Q3. Which time frame shall we consider?
- I don't know the time frame you consider here - but a 1 min chart will look different than a 15/30, or 240 min chart where you only have an aggregated candle crossing the said levels and no turn "visible".
- so which granularity shall we consider, for counting the positive/negatives?
Any comments on the above?
Recent SPY News
- Form NPORT-P - Monthly Portfolio Investments Report on Form N-PORT (Public) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/26/2026 09:49:39 PM
- Form 497 - Definitive materials • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/26/2026 10:07:02 PM
- Form 485BPOS - Post-effective amendment [Rule 485(b)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/26/2026 07:06:17 PM
- Form 24F-2NT - Rule 24f-2 notice • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/17/2025 04:38:46 PM
- Form N-30D - Annual and semi-annual reports mailed to shareholders [Rule 30d-1] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:03:00 PM
- Form NPORT-P - Monthly Portfolio Investments Report on Form N-PORT (Public) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/28/2025 04:03:24 PM
- Form N-30D - Annual and semi-annual reports mailed to shareholders [Rule 30d-1] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/29/2025 07:49:30 PM
