News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2
Posts 217
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/09/2020

Re: TechniTrend post# 323535

Monday, 08/10/2020 4:48:06 AM

Monday, August 10, 2020 4:48:06 AM

Post# of 399177
TT, I don't mind. Can we agree on the assumptions to be taken though ...

Let's take a reference, the figure you just posted:
--------

-> Q1. Where do we consider the turns as hitting the level/vs anywhere? The definition of "close enough"
- in the picture there are some turns around pivot (or "close" enough)
- but at least that many above and below pivots/ and between pivot and next level (above the tolerance level of "close enough").

Visually I would say there are at least twice as many turns outside of the pivot level above and below the close-enough, and not in the close-enough vecinity of the next level up/down...


-> Q2. What is a turn? The size of it, and its duration in time ...
- counting turns depend on what we consider a "turn".
0.25, 0.5, 1 point swing? or any single wiggle visible? The bigger the "turn" size for qualification - the more noise eliminated.
When the jump between levels is 3 points - what should be a turn/price rejection.
We need the size of the turn on the vertical, and the time (how many bars below/above that level. E.g. on a 1min chart - is a price swing inside a single bar considered a positive? )

-> Q3. Which time frame shall we consider?
- I don't know the time frame you consider here - but a 1 min chart will look different than a 15/30, or 240 min chart where you only have an aggregated candle crossing the said levels and no turn "visible".
- so which granularity shall we consider, for counting the positive/negatives?

Any comments on the above?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SPY News