Sup3D, I'm not trying to engage in debate, but I never saw mention the word 'responsible' in your post, whether used in their obvious past responsible uses or future responsible uses, of shares. That's all.
As shareholders we could ask for virtually no better way company insiders be compensated for their services. If services, which rightfully should be compensated for, are done with newly issued shares, it is the absolute, bottom line, most shareholder friendly way of compensation, and should be highly praised, as opposed to simply dismissed, over-looked, mis-interpretated, or otherwise misconstrued in any way, than what it clearly signifies: total faith in their own abilities and the company they perform them for, thereby increasing the fundamental 'bottom-line'. This type of compensation is only one step away from 'insider buying'.
I truly welcome this form of dilution, as any other dilution for compensation adds only to the uphill battle a pinksheet stock already experiences.
I think we would all be hard-pressed to find even one single pinksheet stock that operates in this manner, which is why I believe we have a 'most un-pinkie like' bigboard style company here.
GLTA who also see this. Despite being non-reporting, as I have already said, it may do well to 'throw out the pinkie rule-book' with Hemi. Hold tight to your shares and take profits sparingly, as I believe Hemi will come to surprise us time and again.
AI
to make a million bucks over night" 
