InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 209
Posts 32161
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: kfcyahoo post# 305651

Thursday, 06/25/2020 7:26:16 AM

Thursday, June 25, 2020 7:26:16 AM

Post# of 403047
Obviously I'm out of my realm but you may have helped me connect the dots. Let's see. Forgive me if I'm saying pretty much the same thing you just posted (btw, I hadn't seen it expressed this way before now).

If, at the point in time that the results were measured: 1. The viral load in the untreated culture was X + Y.
2. Then the viral load in the treated culture was .03(X + Y).

Is that it?
I think that equation mathematically says that Brilacidin reduced the viral load in the samples 97% more than nothing at all did. And that's finally starting to sound more meaningful to me.

Thanks.

(Cue the chorus of "We all knew that already")


ps. I hadn't taken the time to look at the link to a similar (at least I think it's similar) test result provided by PP earlier and now that I have I'm left to wonder why the market reacted the way it did to their "The molecule demonstrated an ability to reduce viral replication of SARS-CoV-2 by 98%".
Have a look:
https://www.biospace.com/article/startup-viralclear-drives-antiviral-into-phase-ii-for-covid-19-following-significant-preclinical-results/

A belated "Thanks" to PP for the example.

“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
John Stuart Mill....1867

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News