News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 1820
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/2006

Re: Stock H.O.G. post# 217411

Friday, 12/15/2006 9:27:19 AM

Friday, December 15, 2006 9:27:19 AM

Post# of 311080
Posting this to stockhog just incase he doesn't see my question to Airys... and for other reasons:

Airys or Stockhog... Is there anything that can be done to validate the claim that PWC had anything to do with this? Can't they get PWC (or KPMG) to issue a statement saying yes or no we did or didn't have dealings with SLJB?

Any inquiries from outsiders have led to deadend roads so far and the appearance is that PWC (or KPMG) had nothing to do with SLJB. The last inquiry I saw to PWC said they were directing the inquiry to their security or anti-fraud department.

This is a serious question and one I hope you'll consider following through with. You got the connections... Please get us something material regarding PWC or KPMG involvement other than "PR claims" that we all know have been wrong in the past.

Any claims about client confidentiality is INVALID. It was SLJB themselves that made claims to having dealings with PWC/KPMG and it is SlJB that stands the most to gain by encouraging any statement from PWC or KPMG that would validate the SLJB claim and RESTORE INVESTOR CONFIDENCE.

Thanks.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y