Friday, May 15, 2020 3:56:27 PM
I totally agree that BTHR isn't transparent. I wouldn't recommend that anyone invest in it.
However, the specific things that you presented that allegedly prove that BTHR is a scam, such as:
1) the alleged PO BOX HQ of a business news aggregator,
2) the fact that a pro-BTHR article was deleted from some other website,
3) the fact that the website the article was deleted from has a slightly different name than another website with almost the exact same content (so that they look like the same company),
4) the fact that the deleted article's website doesn't have a Twitter feed
are all either bogus arguments [the UK PO BOX HQ is from a questionable source, and contradicts the location info -- India -- given on that company's own website], merely things to wonder about [why the article was deleted; why the two near-identical websites exist simultaneously], or totally irrelevant [one of the two near-identical websites has a working Twitter feed, the other one doesn't].
People of their own free will choose to "invest" (I think gamble is a better term) their hard-earned money in penny stocks because they are hoping the (high) risk will pay off. Whether the companies are legitimate is an issue separate from whether the gamble will pay off (at least in the short term).
I do have 'a couple of bucks' in BTHR -- which I put in some time ago -- and I am currently in the black. I will likely sell soon. That is purely my choice, which a) I don't have to justify to you and b) I don't make any attempt to have others join with me or say that BTHR is truly a sure thing.
As far as I can tell, your first post with your current username was a call for others to join with you in a shorting strategy against BTHR. I can't say that this stock doesn't look ripe for shorting, but I can say that I think anonymous calls to kill a stock are just about as suspicious as anonymous calls to support one (pump and dumps).
However, the specific things that you presented that allegedly prove that BTHR is a scam, such as:
1) the alleged PO BOX HQ of a business news aggregator,
2) the fact that a pro-BTHR article was deleted from some other website,
3) the fact that the website the article was deleted from has a slightly different name than another website with almost the exact same content (so that they look like the same company),
4) the fact that the deleted article's website doesn't have a Twitter feed
are all either bogus arguments [the UK PO BOX HQ is from a questionable source, and contradicts the location info -- India -- given on that company's own website], merely things to wonder about [why the article was deleted; why the two near-identical websites exist simultaneously], or totally irrelevant [one of the two near-identical websites has a working Twitter feed, the other one doesn't].
People of their own free will choose to "invest" (I think gamble is a better term) their hard-earned money in penny stocks because they are hoping the (high) risk will pay off. Whether the companies are legitimate is an issue separate from whether the gamble will pay off (at least in the short term).
I do have 'a couple of bucks' in BTHR -- which I put in some time ago -- and I am currently in the black. I will likely sell soon. That is purely my choice, which a) I don't have to justify to you and b) I don't make any attempt to have others join with me or say that BTHR is truly a sure thing.
As far as I can tell, your first post with your current username was a call for others to join with you in a shorting strategy against BTHR. I can't say that this stock doesn't look ripe for shorting, but I can say that I think anonymous calls to kill a stock are just about as suspicious as anonymous calls to support one (pump and dumps).
