News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257553
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122973
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: semi_infinite post# 231266

Monday, 04/20/2020 1:53:53 PM

Monday, April 20, 2020 1:53:53 PM

Post# of 257553
Re: Criticism of Stanford (Santa Clara County) study

I see…no discussion about the reasoning behind the criticisms.

The reasoning behind the main criticism—test specificity—is straightforward, IMO.

Mathematically, the confidence interval on any measurement of a true-positive rate will be unduly wide (in orders of magnitude) when the false-positive rate for the test in question is close in value to the underlying true-positive rate in the population being sampled.

There are two ways around this problem: i) develop a better (i.e. more specific) test; or ii) restrict the test in question to a population where the true-positive rate is thought to be much higher than the test's false-positive rate.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Unleash the power of Level 2

Spot liquidity moves with access to US order books.

Sign Up