News Focus
News Focus
Followers 122
Posts 5289
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/27/2005

Re: sometimes_right post# 22613

Saturday, 12/09/2006 10:30:12 PM

Saturday, December 09, 2006 10:30:12 PM

Post# of 115222
Hey SometimesRight...I agree with your Dividend thinking here absolutely...


...You Said: "More SIZEABLE Cash Dividend promotes HIGHER PPS due to incentive for INVESTORS to HOLD their shares LONGER-term, rather than flip their shares as some do... helping to dry-up the float.

...EXAMPLE- A $0.10 cash dividend paid quarterly would be VERY nice..

...SUBSTANTIAL enough for large share holders to hold on to more/all of their shares, which would reduce the amount of shares being actively traded in the float... and thereby drive PPS higher due to lower supply. (imo)"...



--Furthermore and in line with your estimate (which if anywhere close to that .40 per annum amount, would send AURC to double dollar digits almost immediately) provided the company has a strategy to significantly increase the imediate processing revenues while maintaining long and short term production costs...Then (in that case) it should not prove to be an over burden on cash flow earnings....However even better for the company, if the company could devise a plan for similar 'value' of Dividends (as in your example) while increasing cash flows to dividend ratios and reducing the (as exampled) corresponding 45% equivalent of its earnings cash flows (assuming EPS of .85 for fiscal 2007)....Then it is best for all "Affluent Stockholders" long term. ;)

...Also then best to further consider a hedge for the company (in that case)...perhaps using a 'flexible' variant (if paid in all cash) as a percentage of the prevailing variant benchmark tied to the quarterly prevailing market prices of the underlying metal resource.

..."Together we learn -- Together we earn"...
2create