| Followers | 22 |
| Posts | 2839 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 09/25/2019 |
Wednesday, March 04, 2020 9:43:03 AM
955 - yet, the court decided to hear the case. It only needed 4 Justices to decide to hear the case and they could've kicked the issue back down to the 9th circuit if they wanted, reasoning SCOTUS will await for a "real" disagreement between the President and an agency-head he wants removed.
So even though there may be agreement among historically adversarial parties in front of the court, the Justices decided to hear the case, regardless.
So even though there may be agreement among historically adversarial parties in front of the court, the Justices decided to hear the case, regardless.
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Reports Net Income of $3.7 Billion for First Quarter 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/29/2026 11:24:00 AM
- Fannie Mae Releases March 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 04/28/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Plans to Report First Quarter 2026 Financial Results on April 29, 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/27/2026 12:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
