PBS Holding Inc (PBHG)

[Kool Aid Man]

Edward Vakser was indicted by the Dallas County grand jury for "felony theft" on 2/12/2014. He was prosecuted for over a year by the Dallas County District Attorney.

To view all official court documents click here including an affidavit stating he is a "Ukrainian citizen": http://courtecom.dallascounty.org/pav/ Enter case# -->>F1400082<<-- and click “search.”

On 5/1/15 the case was dismissed. Eddie announced the following on all IHub boards dedicated to covering his tickers including this one here on the PBHG board--

"Today, the company and the management is excited to announce the complete dismissal of the case against one of our investors, Mr. Edward Vakser. The much publicized and often misunderstood case has created an unnecessary distraction and caused speculations and negative publicity which harmed our company and its shareholders.

“I always knew and maintained my innocence, however it took time for the “wheels of justice” to turn. I’m very happy and excited that they saw the facts and agreed with the full dismissal... I personally want to thank all the shareholders who believed in my innocence and supported my efforts. Your great support and emails kept me thinking positive and I never lost hope of getting my name cleared!” stated Mr.Vakser."
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113340699

The reality is that, on the eve of his criminal trial, Eddie apparently accepted a "REDUCED CHARGE" (Sentence: "Special Condition") and PAID "FULL RESTITUTION OF $27,500" TO THE PLAINTIFF". As a result of his this his victim filed an "Affidavit of Non Prosecution" with the DA which compelled them to dismiss the charge on May 1, 2015. EDDIE WASN'T FOUND TO BE "INNOCENT" NOR WAS HIS "NAME CLEARED" EXCEPT IN HIS OWN SQUIRREL HEAD. HE PAID BACK WHAT HE STOLE. IF HE WAS INNOCENT AND COULD PROVE IT AS HE INSISTED HE WOULDN'T HAVE PAID.

"REDUCED CHARGE" with "SENTENCE: SPECIAL CONDITION"-->>


"FULL RESTITUTION"-->>


Regardless, Eddie was required to disclose the fact that an officer of his companies was "the SUBJECT of a criminal proceeding" in official disclosures. That's something he did not do until recently.