Reading the Prayer for Relief shows the answer: only money damages for common and preferred shareholders as of the day conservatorship was imposed (September 6 2008).
The "other relief as this Court may deem just and appropriate", if it even applies, won't even approach ending the conservatorships or changing anything from the original SPSPAs. Sweeney's court doesn't have the jurisdiction to do either of those things.
So now from the list above we can conclude:
We can only conclude that the plaintiffs have alleged these things. We cannot conclude that those violations actually occurred: that's Sweeney's job.
Then in the end I’m concluding this Washington Federal case is a total-loss for the government
This is jumping to a conclusion. Sweeney has not even ruled on the motion to dismiss yet, let alone conducted a trial. Unless she does so and finds in favor of the plaintiff, your conclusion is just a guess.
if plaintiff loses in this case all the above accusations need to be proven wrong, and that is something they cannot do as the proof contradicting the governments right is already presented(although Sealed)
Since the evidence is sealed, you cannot say that plaintiffs' points have been proven by it. Have you seen the sealed documents?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
