Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

still lost

are you saying Collins (ENBANC is how I call it) has two parts ? or separate claims - both moving forward

One related to NWS - with us as derivative claimants and being reviewed for action by Lamberth

One - again Collins and EnBanc (or ??) - which pivots on the structure of the FHFA being unconstitutional ?


I apologize big time - you likely have explained as have others -- but now I still remain confused

I thought ENBANC (which I take as Collins and Lamberth) said FHFA was acting outside the realm of conservatorship (HERA) and thus we had a claim in the shoes of F and F ?? and that had nothing to do with the constitutional nature or structure of FHFA?