News Focus
News Focus
Followers 202
Posts 17481
Boards Moderated 8
Alias Born 01/29/2018

Re: Longstrongsilver post# 95978

Thursday, 12/26/2019 6:42:52 PM

Thursday, December 26, 2019 6:42:52 PM

Post# of 153950
And my answer was quite complete. I know the desire is to suspend logic and focus on what that guy said that PWC told him about the shares and the other bid, but let's use a little anyway. That whole rant was about how PWC had mistreated him during the bid and negotiation process. So are we to believe that PWC told him the truth and then turned around and lied to 2 federal courts and the secured creditors? Are we to believe that somehow in this lie they've concealed over 99% of a payment rendered through the end of the proceedings, including the payments to those secured creditors? Seriously?

That guy may have had a complaint against PWC, but he also had legal avenues where that complaint could have been heard in court and, perhaps, wound up with the winning bid. I'm sure the secured creditors would have listened to anyone proposing more than $4.34M, provided it was cash UPFRONT. But, the whiner chose not to pursue anything other than whining. Oh, well.

I see we're back to EXCEPTIONAL word plucking. Good luck with the ENSUING ASPECTS of that.

I swear I’ll never use the phrase “you can’t make this stuff up” ever again after being on the OTC. Apparently you can.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today