News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 47
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/28/2006

Re: urche post# 2086

Sunday, 12/03/2006 11:03:08 PM

Sunday, December 03, 2006 11:03:08 PM

Post# of 19309
Survey question

1: What do you think is the closest probability of eventual approval of AT for DIC in Sepsis based on review of the clinical paper “Treatment effects of high-dose antithrombin without concomitant heparin in patients with severe sepsis with or without disseminated intravascular coagulation”.


<I would want to see a choice of zero. This paper is not sufficient for approval, IMO.>

I think you missed the point of question 1. The point is to get people to look at the paper and provide feedback/insights into the probability of success of the prospective clinical trials already planned for AT in DIC with Sepsis. Of course you can't submit this paper for regulatory approval.

I agree it would be interesting if off-label use were significant for AT in DIC. Leo must think it will be too insignificant so they seem to be starting phase II.

I feel that the paper shows a lot of value for AT in DIC. I hope that people will look at it carefully and provide some very specific feedback.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today