By this time tomorrow you'll be spinning like a dreidel to construct another narrative
Sorry. Check the previous transcripts from closed door hearings. All comments were that they did not agree with Ukraine policy and nothing, again nothing, about abuse of power, bribes or any such crime.
Most of the testimony was questioning why and complaining about not following previous policies. Neither of which is criminal and/or impeachable. The president has the right to formulate and carry out his own foreign policies, as well as require assurances that no ongoing corruption is happening within countries that we give aid to. If a person is a party to corruption and a candidate for office, does that exclude him from any scrutiny? I think not. Ask Hillary. She had Ukraine investigating Trump campaign.
HOPE IS MOTIVATION; REALITY IS PROFIT