brain, i was amidst another mission when i, just now, read your second reply.
a small apolology as i could have just said,
umm brain no, you have easily and politely shown me that it seems this is one that i unfortunately didn't read all of.
the tone in the words would not have been quite the same.
This article is more interesting the more one reads it and it leads to other matters. I now know that 1 pound is some 453 grams and was reminded of the difference between a short ton of 2000 lbs and a long tonne? weighing in at 2240 lbs.
I did get the impression from your posts that you read it as benzo .. was it? whatever and etc .. was the only by-product the study was looking at, is that right? earlier had considered if different grades of coke were a factor in all this then saw that they had said they had found an unusully large amount of "pure heroin" in the Hudson which i don't recall reading before .. actually i could have read it all and only remembered a bit, that's another possibility. brain, there an infinite number of realities and no two person's are too close to the same. anyway the fact that they state this suggests to me that pure heroin is a by-procuct measured and taken into account.
not sure on this question ???
so where am i now. i think i need to ask if the compound you placed in your second reply is in fact pure heroin and in fact there is only one variety of apple. the use of the singular "by-product" then of the plural "by-products" confused me at first until i realized that there were different kinds of apples.
is it one product your compound = pure heroin or two things the study took into account your compound and pure heroin?
man, i am real fuzzy now, hope this makes sense.
this too loud for me now and have to go out to get something to eat but just like title .. i need it now.