| Followers | 65 |
| Posts | 4105 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 02/08/2013 |
Sunday, September 22, 2019 7:14:55 AM
Agreed. Im not a lawyer, but the En Banc decision said shareholders were "injured" by the net worth sweep.
So, it makes sense to prevent FURTHER injury, the injured party should stop injuring shareholders by continuing to robb their company and making it (extra) difficult to recapitalize with continued confiscation of shareholder property by the government agency who was directed to "preserve and conserve" our assets.
So, it makes sense to prevent FURTHER injury, the injured party should stop injuring shareholders by continuing to robb their company and making it (extra) difficult to recapitalize with continued confiscation of shareholder property by the government agency who was directed to "preserve and conserve" our assets.
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
