Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,585.50
(
0.29%
)
US TECH 100
29,527.20
(
0.35%
)
Dow Jones
51,075.99
(
0.80%
)
Brent Oil
90.76
(
-1.55%
)
Bitcoin
73,764.80
(
0.31%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 98414
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

chr p

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 108
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2003

chr p

Re: blauboad post# 14300

Saturday, 09/27/2003 6:38:06 PM

Saturday, September 27, 2003 6:38:06 PM

Post# of 98414
blauboad, We can almost declare Yamhill dead. It would already have developers working on it and rumors all over the place if it were really on the map for 2004--NDA or not. And AMD64 compatibility is just not Intel's style.
I totally agree with you except for the above. Intel is not shy of changing their style unless it doesn't hurt their earnings. Also, if they go with IA64 I don't think it's possible to show impressive performance at a reasonable price. IA64 has only good floating point performance and the desktop applications which should take advantage of it should be ready by 2005 or 2009 according to Intel's recent plans.
regards,
chr
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMD News
More AMD News