WITH STOP SIGN PLAYS THERE IS A LITTLE OR NO RISK OF DILUTION. DEBT THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN ISSUED CAN SELL THEIR SHARES. WITH STOP SIGN THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE AND IMPOSSIBLE TO RS WITH A STOP SIGN PLAY.
$LAHO TYPE 101-OTC TRADING 101-(1.)IN REALITY OTC CURRENT PLAYS ARE JUST FASADS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL *BULLSHIT* BECAUSE IT GIVES IT GIVES INVESTORS A FALSE SENSE OF COMFORT AND THE SO CALLED OTC CURRENT STATUS IS A JAMES BOND LICENSE TO DILUTE BY SO CALLED MANAGEMENT. OTC CURRENT MEANS NOTHING FOR TRADERS BECAUSE 99% PLAYS MAKE NO REAL MONEY AND DON'T PAY DIVIDENDS EITHER SO WHAT DOES CURRENT STATUS DO FOR A TRADER AGAIN BESIDE REMIND INVESTORS OF JAMES BOND LICENSE TO DILUTE AND THEY MAKE NO MONEY??? EEH HUH AHAHAHAH HMMMM
THINK A OTC CURRENT PLAY IS BETTER THAN A STOP SIGN PLAY? IF YOUR ANSWER IS YES, IT'S WRONG. I USED TO THINK THAT TOO.
THE TOP 2 THINGS THAT PLAGUES STOCKS ARE (1.) DILUTION AND (2.) REVERSE SPLITS. WITH OTC CURRENT PLAYS ONE IS EXPOSED TO THESE TWO BIG FACTORS.
BECAUSE STOP SIGN PLAYS *NEED* TO BE OTC CURRENT TO ISSUE NEW SHARES AND REVERSE SPLIT. IT IS IMPOSIBLE FOR A STOP SIGN PLAY TO RS. GREAT FOR TRADERS AHAHAHAA AHAHAHA