We knew about wood features being found. George even said "we have found large wooden features of the ship already" at the 7:40 mark. That wasn't new information. If it was supposed to be, he did a piss poor job communicating it.
SFRX's stock PIMPS are out trying to suggest this is something new, with George's help of course. There is no mention ANYWHERE of a qualified person dating the wood to 1715.
This is from Dr. Alden's report which is mentioned starting on Page 28 linked below. There is no conclusion regarding the wood.
In reviewing the wood analysis (Figure 9), two samples stood out: SEA #0439 and SEA #0443.
*Sample SEA#0439 appeared to be a tropical hardwood; however the sample was too small for definitive analysis.
*SEA#0443, which is located in Area 1, appeared to be a type of European fir
Both of these samples lead to a possible conclusion that the subject wood, if from the same vessel, may be from a ship that was likely constructed in Europe, with possible modifications made in the “tropics”. This fit in well with the theory that the site being worked may have been involved with trade in the New World during the Colonial period. Any ship that worked in tropical waters for any amount of time likely needed repairs. If in an area where tropical hardwoods were the materials used to construct those vessels, then one might expect that there would be a mix of both European and New World sourced woods
If they found and an expert dated wood to 1715, that should be put in writing.....somewhere. It certainly would be better for shareholders if it was filed in an 8K that linked the full report.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
