I am sorry, I guess this Phrase confused me "Here's something to put minimums into perspective- "
I mean since
- we don't know the terms of the royalty minimum payments
- QTMM has nothing to do with Solterra
- Solterra was the payer of the royalties not the receiver
- Solterra is a private sector company QTMM partner is private sector/government company
The only perspective I came away with is you trying to down play the significant of QTMM establishing a recurring revenue contract with something that has no relationship to QTMM situation.