Tornado Alley (PROG)

[Tearex]

How many times do you need to read that Mueller COULDN'T recommend Trump for prosecution because of the dumb-ass DOJ guideline prohibiting such?

1. That does not prohibit him from prosecuting JR, as you insinuated he could have.
2. I would like to read the exact recommendation you're claiming, but you did not include a link or even the passage you are referencing.
3. There was no Obstruction, period. Trump had constitutional authority to fire Mueller. Trump did not try to fire Mueller, if he did, Mueller would have been fired. Furthermore, even if he did fire him that does not constitute OOJ. The only OOJ besides Hillary's destruction of subpoenaed
evidence, was Muellers incomplete investigation of who colluded with Russia.


And Red State, seriously?

Does it really matter? These are all facts. Do you dispute anything?


Somehow Robert Mueller Manages To Omit Some Very Interesting Information From His Report On The Trump Tower Meeting
Posted at 10:30 am on April 20, 2019 by streiff

1. He doesn’t report that Natalia Veselnitskaya was a stringer for Fusion GPS in its efforts to have Magnitsky Act sanctions lifted on Oleg Deripaska.
2. He doesn’t report that Rinat Akhmetshin held a similar relationship with Fusion GPS. See SHOCKER. You Won’t Believe Who Employed The “Former Soviet Counterintelligence Official” In Trump Meeting.
3. He doesn’t report that Veselnitskaya was banned from entering the United States during the time of the meeting but for some reason the Obama State Department gave her a waiver. See Senator Charles Grassley Has A Huge Question About Donald Trump Jr.’S Meet-Up With The Russian Lawyer [UPDATED] (VIDEO).
4. He doesn’t mention that Veselnitskaya met with Fusion GPS honcho Glenn Simpson before and after the Trump Tower meeting. See And Who Exactly Did That Kremlin Lawyer Meet With Before And After The Famous Trump Tower Meeting?
5. Mueller does a lot of hand-waving about Veselnistkaya working on behalf of a Russian businessman named Peter Katsyv and Prevezon Holdings and ignores her lobbying on behalf of Oleg Deripaska, a Fusion GPS client and an FBI asset during the time Mueller was FBI director. See There Might Be A Very Good Reason Why Mueller Is Not Indicting Paul Manafort’s Russian Business Partner.

This omission of seemingly relevant background details in not unique. There are other instances in the report where connections between persons who are insinuated to be working in behalf of the Russian government also had links to the FBI.

The report paints a picture of an investigation that is more intent upon reinforcing the narrative of Russian ties to the Trump campaign by innuendo than one that is trying to get at the truth behind the allegations that started the investigation. Say, yes, but also to be expected because there is no way Mueller and his team were going to dig into anything that didn’t make Trump look bad.
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2019/04/20/somehow-robert-mueller-manages-omit-interesting-information-report-trump-tower-meeting/