"A quick check with a calculator, based on the 124M+ outstanding, confirms that 7M shares is actually 5.61% of 124M+, and not 5.1%."
The issue doesn't involve the percentage of outstanding shares owned....surely you know that.
"He isn’t making it easy; it seems like he filed a similar document on 6/5/19, stating that he had a 5.6% stake in the company:"
He screwed up the original filing by reporting a percentage of shares outstanding in a column entitled "Number of Shares Owned" so he replaced that filing with a corrected version. He should have advised OTCMarkets that it was an Amended filing and they would have moved the original filing into the Inactive status. Obviously he didn't do that, resulting in confusion on the part of thousands of shareholders (like you)....there can't be two Active filings reporting different data.
"Perhaps these contradictory filings are a result not of him selling actual shares, but rather cutting and pasting irregularities?"
It wouldn't surprise me to find out that Cap'n Dick wasn't regular in any fashion but this is a serious question based on filings that he was required to make. He signed them.
I asked the question of the specific person I did because of questions that that person raised about sales made by the Flounder and CEO Heddle's predecessor who acknowledged making sales in Court testimony and in an interview with a reporter yet those sales remain questioned. I'd still like to hear from that person for obvious reasons, but I'd be happy just to have the question answered by anyone, preferably someone who won't try to lay something so critical off on a number of fat fingered boo-boos.
It's a simple question. How did he get from beneficially owning 7,000,000 share on 5/29/18 to beneficially owning 1,375,000 shares on 6/5/19 without selling any shares?
Or is the answer simple as well....he sold a boatload of shares and failed to report those sales.
But can it core A apple?
Yes Ralph, of course it can core A apple.
