The questions of the women were all in search of the truth, and i was thinking their approach
was in stark contrast to the earlier approach of Nunes and his other Trump cronies.
Then Jim Jordan came on the scene, suggesting that since Trump didn't fire Comey or Rosenstein there could not have been any wrong doing.
Picture a guy who asked another to commit arson, and the other refused. Or a guy who asked another to commit murder,
then the other was prevented from doing it. Or the other refused. Is the first guy innocent of breaking any law?
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”