Monday, May 20, 2019 6:56:04 PM
A different viewpoint much more realistic in my opinion:
* .0121 * 235 = $2.8435 or say $2.85 cents on the sale
-> What was the trade cost? Let's say at least $5.00
-> At best then they lost $2.15
-> Perhaps your "Congratulations" analysis is flawed?
-> If your "Congratulations" Analysis is flawed then perhaps ALL of your analysis is flawed? Agreed?
Sure looks more like "Market Manipulation" IMO
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM