News Focus
News Focus
Followers 89
Posts 52843
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/05/2010

Re: fuagf post# 311032

Monday, 05/13/2019 10:24:02 PM

Monday, May 13, 2019 10:24:02 PM

Post# of 576121
It was in the post I was responding to. I referenced it as follows:

Why did you select that from Wikipedia and not this?

Volume I of the report concludes that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law".[2][3][4] It lists two methods by which Russia attempted to influence the election. Firstly, a social media campaign by the Internet Research Agency (IRA) which supported the Trump presidential campaign, attacked the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, and aimed to "amplify political and social discord".[5][6][7]

Secondly, Russian intelligence GRU conducted computer hacking and strategically released damaging material stolen from the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations.[8][9][10] The report identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government,[11] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[12] During the Mueller investigation.

You continue to misstate the importance of the Dossier which was NOT what the FISA warrant was issued in consideration of/based upon, much less renewed.

Get some evidence to support your bullshit.



Here is the link he posted, which I deftly used against his cherry picked argument:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report#Russian_interference


Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today