News Focus
News Focus
Followers 88
Posts 52825
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/05/2010

Re: conix post# 310696

Friday, 05/10/2019 8:32:27 PM

Friday, May 10, 2019 8:32:27 PM

Post# of 575804
Save your sorrow for yourself, you earned it by being either too damned dumb or too damned intellectually lazy, or more likely both, to do a simple fact check.

And, like with hatred, you mistake deserved derision and contempt for anger.


https://www.axios.com/hillary-clinton-2016-election-votes-supreme-court-liberal-justice-1b4bc4fc-9fad-44b4-ab54-9ef86aa9c1f1.html

The WashPost's Philip Bump did the math about Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin back during the transition:

•"Trump won those states by 0.2, 0.7 and 0.8 percentage points, respectively — and by 10,704, 46,765 and 22,177 votes.

Those three wins gave him 46 electoral votes; if Clinton had done one point better in each state, she'd have won the electoral vote, too."

•"But for 79,646 votes cast in those three states, she'd be the next president of the United States."

•P.S. "The 540-vote margin in Florida that swung the 2000 election is still the modern record-holder for close races."

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today