One of the major problems that short term investors have , why they're often not credible, is that they purposely conflate the battle with the war. Over the long term it's silly to have conniptions over a bad quarter. And sillier to extrapolate that performance to predict a company's future.
The CEO sold shares. Whoop de damn doo. So he had expenses, was up in the stock and actually decided to pay for something that he needed or wanted? It's a shame this board is dominated by lightweights who are constantly trying to prove they're not.