Which would make it extra sweet if iCon tells Intel to go f. themselves, and starts purchasing microprocessors from AMD, just as Dell did.
That is a somewhat credible scenario given Jobs's past antics with IBM and Motorola but that is quite different from the ludicrous BS claim of yours that Apple should have gone AMD from the start.
PS: Wasn't the argument that Dell will never use AMD that Intel provided all the engineering and hand holding to Dell?
It was that factor vs the competitiveness lead AMD had in x86 server MPUs in 2005 and the first half of 2006. What is surprising about Dell's move IMO isn't so much that it happened but when it happened - after Intel closed the gap with AMD in 4S and opened a significant performance and power efficiency lead in 2S. Talk about closing the barn door after the horse has left. IMO that supports the view that Dell management made the move 1) mainly to be seen by Wall street as doing something to address its slipping position vs HP, and 2) Dell is going to have to compete on bargain basement pricing and margins more than ever. The fact that Dell hung on for so long before going AMD suggests the above factors did indeed carry a lot of weight.